Received: from LNXP265MB1145.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:5c::21) by CWXP265MB1269.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM with HTTPS via CWLP265CA0273.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:11:04 +0000 Received: from LNXP265MB0460.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.166.178.21) by LNXP265MB1145.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (20.176.131.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.20; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:11:04 +0000 Received: from LNXP265MB0460.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::c4d5:5ba8:943e:65a0]) by LNXP265MB0460.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::c4d5:5ba8:943e:65a0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1580.019; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:11:04 +0000 From: "Moss, Mark" To: "Chisnall, Emma" Subject: Variation of conditions 2 & 3 & replace proposed acoustic fence by a timber fence Thread-Topic: Variation of conditions 2 & 3 & replace proposed acoustic fence by a timber fence Thread-Index: AdS+MYkvl5poKqAnREyP4yi88g2WTA== Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:11:04 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 04 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: LNXP265MB0460.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: f82538c1-7234-488f-3168-08d68c4db1fc X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0 x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-originating-ip: [82.203.80.25] x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: LNXP265MB1145: x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2019 16:11:04.5408 (UTC) x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-fromentityheader: Hosted x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-id: 575c0bde-3a1d-4474-85c6-550cf50fdc99 x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-network-message-id: f82538c1-7234-488f-3168-08d68c4db1fc x-ms-exchange-transport-crosstenantheadersstamped: LNXP265MB1145 x-ms-exchange-transport-endtoendlatency: 00:00:00.4115411 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;CWXP265MB1269;27:F/Jcer8gbj56J7DnaYtpY5lS3aHg1YMfejTzbRP9vaXHNT7NzaQAsDKdi6vEpwnSQMPgLmYKIznQzKs61z7TOAqCDGEJJHjRgMu/Ezu7BvfuIJTv7U7JvVnM7QwZeFhHFlnGuuLC/WfRoWg6qyx/Isva3Ayp8TXRn9dLpbpH1DeerOsKxWW9AmqOauqoytRm5vtfk9woJwLypQnOLLIMAL5lobOWmvRqOijsSHFZkY4BgCGuMg0Xjef6pltqfIlb1oatQ1OQp361vml2PCSLZ4574RpqSbOIhCfOqwfGnhixmcl5okWYdYPWAm/TTUJ353TLbG+eHUxDXOKelnSUVS4xjSQUADfH5l09K3LzBgv7rSObPBsbjvzFbJsfaCcomD0IS1Bj00M66L3bKEGsHUWHTyGBAU7MZ+LIxw2/lEw= X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery: ucf:0;jmr:0;ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(750119)(520011016)(706158)(944506303)(944626516); X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: vbKmeuShTfD1J3V6B3SDQ1p/xJroocJZAqal8TXG6fRuJ9yRIHNYLt1yfwUzzSJP6SDNwbBzgEsmQCqiXQY/XC0tMKF8NMAsLglaY7ulW5AEnswsWSfd4DsCd/PqCAUFjszvDdRSjL1D54AAWoPgg1w4djyAAxAh065TxbTUxUXXEdxClLn2ASwyCojwKZhyLWL5KnQ/agENIxyPH8bWE1XuXpJ9xrzLGviN6nBAi4CiSvXYXK9NYlu5J+/Jn9PsXGVXGiWi+I9C+vsJA92HWsxX4+6kP1ZHLLoF+EueKzZQwP0D2hFpNeGKrJlqXvBGfysZE+Rn3xCHZos/wgkf/iRFjpeQUtYjrV/F24YTLqZJ9tXZ3bkQ1Q+F+XUN3l5T6PhYKI6xeKm4dG7zyCLbNxDoAPJlNyZ9LqJsrByoUiY0l4/QAidOnUCEMrBhpU5U Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_LNXP265MB04609BC25ADA20BBE14DC010A76F0LNXP265MB0460GBRP_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_LNXP265MB04609BC25ADA20BBE14DC010A76F0LNXP265MB0460GBRP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Emma I can't seem to establish the reason for the change from acoustic fence to standard timber fence. It appears that the acoustic fence was included in the initial Design & Access statement in May 2017 (see below): Page 17 of 29 4000_GFP_DOC_DNA_106 Figure 8 Transformer Noise and Air Quality 4.32 The generator sets are housed within bespoke acoustic containers. The containers are louvered enclosures which maintain the air flow needed by the equipment by way of directly mounted fans that draw air through the containers. The air intake and outflow is through a sound baffle which reduces the sound of the engines. The sound pressure level at 1m from all surfaces of the container is 75dB(A). A 4m high inner acoustic fence absorbs the noise and helps reduce the sound by a further 9dbA. Barriers such as vegetation/trees, buildings and the elevated A27 can further reduce the noise pressure levels. As is pointed out the nearest residential receptors are some distance away. I will advise at this time ' no adverse comments '. However, as there are commercial properties close by, there is the potential for noise impact. I would therefore advise that if noise complaints were to be received in the future relating to the activities on this site, the above no adverse comments will not prejudice in any way, any actions that may be necessary in terms of nuisance legislation (which might also include the installation of acoustic barriers). Regards Mark Moss Regulatory Officer Environmental Health Pollution Havant Borough Council Public Service Plaza, Civic Centre Road, Havant PO9 2AX Tel: 02392-446666 / 446670 E-mail: mark.moss@havant.gov.uk www.havant.gov.uk www.facebook.com/havantboroughcouncil www.twitter.com/havantborough Your privacy matters, go to www.havant.gov.uk/privacy-policy Information in this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the message from your system immediately. --_000_LNXP265MB04609BC25ADA20BBE14DC010A76F0LNXP265MB0460GBRP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Emma

 

I can’t seem to establish the reason for the change from acoustic fence to standard timber fence.  It appears that the acoustic fence was included in the initial Design & Access statement in May 2017 (see below):

 

Page 17 of 29

4000_GFP_DOC_DNA_106

Figure 8 Transformer

Noise and Air Quality

4.32 The generator sets are housed within bespoke acoustic containers. The containers are

louvered enclosures which maintain the air flow needed by the equipment by way of

directly mounted fans that draw air through the containers. The air intake and outflow

is through a sound baffle which reduces the sound of the engines. The sound pressure

level at 1m from all surfaces of the container is 75dB(A). A 4m high inner acoustic fence

absorbs the noise and helps reduce the sound by a further 9dbA. Barriers such as

vegetation/trees, buildings and the elevated A27 can further reduce the noise pressure

levels.

 

As is pointed out the nearest residential receptors are some distance away. 

 

I will advise at this time ‘ no adverse comments ‘.   However, as there are commercial properties close by, there is the potential for noise impact.  I would therefore advise that if noise complaints were to be received in the future relating to the activities on this site, the above no adverse comments will not prejudice in any way, any actions that may be necessary in terms of nuisance legislation (which might also include the installation of acoustic barriers).

 

Regards

 

Mark  Moss

Regulatory Officer

Environmental Health Pollution

Havant Borough Council

Public Service Plaza, Civic Centre Road, Havant PO9 2AX

Tel:  02392-446666 / 446670

E-mail: mark.moss@havant.gov.uk

 

www.havant.gov.uk

www.facebook.com/havantboroughcouncil

www.twitter.com/havantborough

 

Your privacy matters, go to www.havant.gov.uk/privacy-policy

 

Information in this message is confidential and may be privileged.  It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the message from your system immediately. 

 

--_000_LNXP265MB04609BC25ADA20BBE14DC010A76F0LNXP265MB0460GBRP_--